How Carbon Accounting Rules Shape Incentives for Hydrogen Production

Aug 10, 2026·
Gunther Glenk
Philip Holler
Philip Holler
,
Stefan Reichelstein
· 0 min read
Modern energy plant with a tall exhaust stack, framed by trees.
Abstract
Governments around the world have recently adopted policy support programs for hydrogen, tying the level of support to the assessed carbon intensity of the hydrogen produced. Here we compare alternative carbon accounting rules for determining the policy support available for hydrogen in terms of the resulting financial and carbon emissions performance of Power-to-Gas systems. We calibrate our model to reference plants eligible for the production tax credit available under the Inflation Reduction Act in the United States. Contrary to frequently articulated views, more stringent accounting rules generally provide investors with sufficient incentives to invest in Power-to-Gas systems. Nonetheless, even more stringent rules can lead to carbon intensity levels close to those for hydrogen produced from natural gas with carbon capture. Less stringent rules generally entail stronger investment incentives due to higher profitability, but also significantly higher emissions as investors procure more carbon-intensive electricity from the general grid.
Type
Publication
Nature Communications
Status
Peer-reviewed Open access
publications
Philip Holler
Authors
Doctoral Candidate
I am a doctoral candidate at the University of Mannheim and a researcher at the Mannheim Institute for Sustainable Energy Studies (MISES). I combine techno-economic analysis with carbon accounting to study the economics of decarbonization technologies, emission allocation effects and the investment incentives it shapes. I have held visiting positions at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Toulouse School of Management. My research has been published in Energy & Environmental Science and Nature Communications.